Radhakrishnan Panel Recommends Restructuring of NTA

Syllabus: GS2/Education

Context

  • A high-level committee of experts, headed by former chairperson of ISRO K. Radhakrishnan, has recommended restructuring of the National Testing Agency (NTA).

Need For the Reforms

  • Question Paper Leaks and Malpractices: Compromised exam security leads to question paper leaks, giving unfair advantages to some students. For Example: NEET-UG Paper Leak, UGC Net irregularities etc
    • Manipulation of marks, like arbitrary awarding of grace marks, creates an uneven playing field.
  • Exam Cancellations and Technical Glitches: Frequent exam cancellations due to these issues lead to delays, added stress, and financial burdens for aspirants.
  • Lack of Transparency: Variations in difficulty levels across different exam sessions raise concerns about fairness and comparability.
  • Normalization Issues: The process of normalizing scores to account for varying difficulty levels can be opaque and lead to disputes.
  • Other Challenges: Like allegations of political interference, instances of corruption, like the Vyapam scam etc. 
  • Loss of Trust: These problems erode public trust in the examination system and its ability to conduct fair assessments.

Key Recommendations of Panel for Exam Reforms

  • Examinations Conducted: NTA from 2025 will conduct only entrance exams for higher education institutions and not recruitment exams.
  • Restructuring of NTA: 10 new posts covering administration, digital infrastructure, IT security being created in an effort aimed at an error-free examination process for students. 
  • Digi- Exam: On the lines of Digi-Yatra, to make the examination process foolproof, authentication at the stages of application, test, admission.
  • Governing Body: It recommended to set up an empowered and accountable governing body with three designated sub-committees to oversee test audit, ethics and transparency, nomination and staff conditions. 
  • Coordination Committee: It recommends that Coordination Committees at State and District levels may be set up with specified roles and responsibilities.
  • Test Centres: The panel also recommended usage of Kendriya Vidyalayas (KVs) and Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas (JNVs) across the country as test centres.
  • Secure Question Paper Transportation: This includes the use of secure courier services, sealed by authorized officials and validated by the NTA before dispatch.
    • Containers must be locked, monitored during transit, and handed over at test centers under CCTV surveillance and NTA supervision.
  • Online Examinations: On the recommendations of the Panel, the government plans to introduce computer adaptive testing for future entrance exams. 
Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means ) Act, 2024
– The Act broadly defines “unfair means” to include various malpractices, such as:
1. Leaking question papers or answer keys,
2. Assisting candidates during exams (unauthorized communication, providing solutions),
3. Tampering with computer networks or resources,Impersonating candidates,
4. Conducting fake examinations or issuing fake documents,
5. Tampering with documents for merit lists or ranks.
Penalties and Punishments:
Individuals:
1. Imprisonment ranges from 3 to 10 years depending on the offense’s severity.
2. Fines up to Rs. 1 crore for organized crimes.
Service providers:
1. Fines up to Rs. 1 crore for involvement in malpractices.
2. Barring from conducting public examinations for 4 years.
3. Personal liability for directors/management involved.
Organized crimes:
1. Harsher penalties, with imprisonment between 5 and 10 years and a minimum fine of Rs. 1 crore
2. The institution involved can face property attachment and forfeiture
Investigation: 
– All offences under the Act are cognisable, non-bailable, and non-compoundable.
– An officer not below the rank Deputy Superintendent or Assistant Commissioner of Police will investigate the offences under the Act. 
– The Central Government may transfer the investigation to any Central Investigating Agency.

Source: TH