Bihar’s Caste-Based Count

In News

  • Recently, Bihar Cabinet approved a proposal to carry out a caste-based ‘count’ in the State. 

Relevance and need for the caste count

  • A step towards equality:
    • A caste census would help us point out those castes that are not represented in the institutions of this country so that steps towards equality can be established.
    • It would also justify the extension of reservations to various communities.
    • The aim is that every section of society can progress properly.
  • The Last Caste data with the government:
    • last caste census was in 1931 and the government still uses this as a basis to estimate demography and different caste groups. 
    • There have been significant changes in the demography of this country.
  • Data unavailability:
    • The Rohini Commission too, faced difficulties due to the unavailability of data on various communities classified under OBCs.
      • The Commission was set up to examine the issue of sub-categorisation of OBCs.
  • Effective service delivery:
    • A fresh estimate of the population is necessary to ensure more effective delivery of targeted welfare.
  • State actions on caste data collection:
    • Karnataka, Odisha and Telangana had carried out similar counts in the name of “socio-economic surveys”.
  • Popular demand:
    • Along with Bihar, other states like Jharkhand and Odisha are also reiterating their support for the caste census. 

Criticisms

  • A colonial practice:
    • Every Census until 1931 had data on caste. So it was a colonial practice of divide and rule which drove them toward collecting such data.
    • Every Census in independent India from 1951 to 2011 has published data on Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, but not on other castes. 
  • May increase caste divisions:
    • the 21st century India should be discussing ‘let’s do away with caste’ rather than further divide India on those lines. 
    • Caste census may “rekindle divisive feelings among people.
  • Demand for reservations:
    • Reservations that were implemented for 10 years have continued for 75 years and a caste-based census may lead to a demand for more.
  • No constitutional Mandate:
    • Unlike in the case of the SCs and the STs, there is no constitutional mandate for the Registrar-General and Census Commissioner of India, to provide the census figures of the OBCs and the BCCs.
  • Difficulties in such count:
    • Union government contended that such an exercise was not feasible given that there are too many castes and sub-castes in each state and Union territory making it difficult to classify them.
      • People use their clan/gotra, sub-caste and caste names interchangeably.
    • The government has cited numerous administrative, operational and logistical reasons.
    • Census data enumerators are part-timers with 6-7 days of training and are “not an investigator or verifier
      • There is a fear that such counting could endanger the census exercise itself.
  • Political agenda:
    • At a deeper level there are politics involved in the matter.
    • Bihar’s politics has been dominated by the Other Backward Castes (OBCs), the numerically powerful social group.
  • Socio-economic caste census (SECC)
    • Union government cited that the socio-economic caste census (SECC) conducted by the government in 2011 contained too many discrepancies and the data was caste data was withheld.

History of Caste Census

  • A population census was first carried out by the British colonial state in 1872.
  • The 65-page census volume enumerated the populations of various castes, including Brahmins, Kshatriyas and Rajputs across several provinces.
  • Caste populations were specifically counted based on their traditional occupations at the time.
    • For instance, “Hindoos” in the Madras province were counted in 17 sets, which included “priests, warriors, traders, agriculturists, shepherds and pastoral castes” among others.
  • The last time comprehensive data on caste was collected was in the 1931 Census.

Why has it not been carried out since 1931?

  • The categories of ‘Race, Caste or Tribe’ was replaced by the ‘Scheduled Tribe/ Scheduled Caste’.
  • There is little documentation about the discussion or debate that had transpired between leaders of the time on what the census would include.
  • Subsequent reports and studies have attributed to the belief that “including caste data in census enumeration will perpetuate the caste system and deepen social divisions”.
    • Recording of caste was abandoned after Indian Independence in 1947, to help smooth the growth of a secular state.

Way Ahead

  • The need for a caste census can also be seen in the vast income disparity in the country. 
  • A 2020 Oxfam report states that 
    • the top 10% of India’s population owns 74.3 % of the total wealth; 
    • the middle 40% owns 22.9%; 
    • and the bottom 50% owns a shocking 2.8 %.
  • Such an unequal distribution of wealth demands a greater understanding of Indian society. 
  • Meaningful policies that address affirmative action as a method of reducing the rich-poor gap are essential and, in order to properly understand the distribution of wealth in the country.
  • The need of the hour is to devise ways and means to concentrate upon the castes and classes who are still deprived, under-privileged and improvised.

Socio-economic caste census (SECC)

  • It is a study of the socio-economic status of rural and urban households and allows ranking of households based on predefined parameters.  
    • Census in Rural Area has been conducted by the Department of Rural Development.
    • Census in Urban areas is under the administrative jurisdiction of the Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation.
  • It is also the first paperless census in India conducted on hand-held electronic devices by the government in 640 districts.
  • The flaws in the data stem primarily from the fact that no registry of castes was prepared before conducting the 2011 caste census. 
    • This resulted in mistakes by enumerators, who spelt the same caste in dozens of different ways. 
    • At the national level, whereas the total number of castes as per the last caste census of 1931 was 4,147, the SECC-2011 showed the presence of 46 lakh different castes. 
  • Since the total number cannot be “exponentially high to this extent”, the government has said this entire data set is flawed and the census unreliable, rendering it unusable for the purposes of reservations and policy. 
  • For these reasons, it has refused to make public even the raw caste data of the SECC-2011.

Source: TH