In News
- Recently, 2023-24 Union Budget speech, the finance minister announced that the total central government budget for health will be roughly be Rs 615 for every citizen.
More about the news
- About:
- In her 2023-24 Union Budget speech, the finance minister announced that the total central government budget for health will be roughly Rs 86,175 crore ($10 billion) — that is, roughly Rs 615 for every citizen.
- This is a 2.7 percent increase from the previous fiscal year and lower than the rate of inflation.
- In real terms, the central government’s health spending has declined.
- In her 2023-24 Union Budget speech, the finance minister announced that the total central government budget for health will be roughly Rs 86,175 crore ($10 billion) — that is, roughly Rs 615 for every citizen.
- Significance of budgetary spending on health:
- The $10 billion spent by the central government may be a small fraction of overall health spending but it is consequential as it pays for:
- Immunisation, newborn and child health and nutrition, maternal health, infectious disease control, health systems and training.
- This spending by the government purchases far more health than out-of-pocket or private spending by Indian citizens.
- The $10 billion spent by the central government may be a small fraction of overall health spending but it is consequential as it pays for:
Issues with the lower budgetary allocations on health
- Burden of healthcare in India:
- Vaccinating a single child against all childhood illnesses costs at least Rs 1,600.
- A day of hospitalisation at a public hospital is estimated at Rs 2,800.
- At a private hospital, it is Rs 6,800.
- Add to these the expenses for supporting women through deliveries, control of infectious disease, primary healthcare, and much more.
- It is, therefore, no surprise that the system fails the most vulnerable and they are forced to turn to the expensive private sector.
- For elderly and sick:
- The poor, elderly and sick are already at a disadvantage and the burden of health expenditure makes this even worse.
- Increasing poor and non-poor gap:
- A greater proportion of disposable incomes is taken away from a poor household as compared to a non-poor one, further broadening the gap between the two.
- If sickness hits a working member of the household, she/he must often withdraw from active employment and their main source of income dries up at the time when they urgently need more money for treatment.
- Households have to often sell or mortgage their productive assets, such as land and cattle, to cover the treatment costs.
- This further reduces their capacity to bounce back.
- According to the WHO, 55 million people fall into poverty or deeper poverty every year due to catastrophic expenditures on health.
- A greater proportion of disposable incomes is taken away from a poor household as compared to a non-poor one, further broadening the gap between the two.
- Lesser spending than the Lower and Middle-Income Countries:
- India currently spends about Rs 8 lakh crore or about 3.2 percent of its GDP on health.
- This is much lower than the average health spending share of the GDP — at around 5.2 percent of the Lower and Middle Income Countries (LMIC).
- Comparing the data:
- Of this, the government (Centre and states put together) spends about roughly 1.1 percent of the GDP.
- Contrast this with the government health expenditure in countries like China (3 percent), Thailand (2.7 percent), Vietnam (2.7 percent) and Sri Lanka (1.4 percent).
Suggestions
- Rationalising NHM spendings:
- The National Health Mission allocates less than 3 percent to non-communicable diseases (NCD) flexipool.
- In comparison, the allocation for communicable diseases is three times more.
- The burden of disease from NCDs accounts for more than half of the total burden of disease.
- Greater focus on communicable diseases is driven by past epidemiological patterns and should be rebalanced now to pay attention to non-communicable diseases.
- The National Health Mission allocates less than 3 percent to non-communicable diseases (NCD) flexipool.
- Balancing Urban and poor health care:
- Public health and primary health care focus on rural areas.
- Urban areas have poorly developed infrastructure for primary care even if secondary and tertiary health care services are better.
- For example, immunisation coverage is now lower in urban India than in rural India.
- A third of the country now lives in urban areas and greater resources are needed to improve health here.
- Focussing on Health research:
- Health research has been neglected for too long.
- The bulk of the resources provided to the Indian Council of Medical Research goes towards maintaining a large payroll of scientists and the output is poor.
- India should follow the example of countries where government-funded health research is conducted at academic institutions, and the government’s role is to make grants and not to carry out the majority of research.
- Competitive funding will encourage the best research and the example of the Wellcome Trust/DBT-India Alliance in promoting the culture of competitive grants can be replicated across the system.
Way ahead
- This is not an example of efficient use of resources when the country spends too little on health, too many people suffer the consequences of ill health.
- The health (and education) of Indians is the most important determinant of what the country can achieve during the next 25 years of Amrit Kaal.
- We must find ways to both find more money for health, and also more health for the money to ensure that all Indians achieve their true potential.
Source: IE
Previous article
Angel Tax & Start-Ups in India
Next article
Spy Balloon