Syllabus :GS 2/Governance
In News
- The Supreme Court questioned the practicality of establishing Gram Nyayalayas given the inadequate infrastructure of regular courts.
About Gram Nyayalayas
- The Law Commission of India proposed the establishment of Gram Nyayalayas in its 114th Report to ensure affordable and quick access to justice for rural citizens.
- The Gram Nyayalayas Act was enacted on October 2, 2009, applying throughout India except in certain northeastern states and specified tribal areas.
- The Act does not apply to Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh, Sikkim, and certain tribal areas in Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, and Mizoram.
Key Features and Objectives:
- Location: Headquarters at the intermediate Panchayat; Nyayadhikaris may visit villages to hear cases.
- Accessibility: Designed to provide inexpensive justice at the doorstep of rural communities.
- Establishment: Set up for each intermediate Panchayat or groups of contiguous Panchayats, located at their headquarters.
- Procedures: Handle specified civil and criminal cases using a summary procedure, with an emphasis on conciliation.
- Flexibility: Not strictly bound by the Indian Evidence Act, guided by natural justice principles.
Challenges
- Feasibility Concerns: The Supreme Court questioned the practicality of establishing gram nyayalayas given the inadequate infrastructure of regular courts.
- Only about 314 out of a targeted 2,500 gram nyayalayas are operational across India.
- Funding Issues: State governments struggle to fund existing courts, making it unlikely they can support additional rural courts.
- Limited Effectiveness: Concerns were raised about the effectiveness of gram nyayalayas, as some magistrates handle very few cases (e.g., one in Karnataka managed only 116 cases in four years).
- Potential Burden on Higher Courts: The court warned that establishing these rural courts might lead to an increase in appeals and writ petitions in high courts, counteracting the intended purpose of declogging district courts.
Suggestions
- The Supreme Court suggested increasing the number of regular courts and judicial officers, rather than establishing more gram nyayalayas.
- The court proposed that the establishment of gram nyayalayas should be based on specific state needs rather than a uniform mandate across all states.
Source :HT
Previous article
Supreme Court Upholds Section 6A of Citizenship Act
Next article
SCO Summit 2024