Armenia-Azerbaijan Conflict

In News

Recently, Armenia has been witnessing growing anti-government protests against possible concessions over the Nagorno-Karabakh territory, disputed with neighbouring Azerbaijan.

About the Conflict

  • Protestors are demanding the resignation of  Prime Minister (PM) Nikol Pashinyan and are taking the means of strike like, chanting anti-government slogans, blocking metro from moving etc.
  • Location: Nagorno-Karabakh is a mountainous and heavily forested region that under international law is recognised as part of Azerbaijan. 

Image Courtesy: Press 

  • History: 
    • Ethnic Armenians who constitute the vast majority of the population there reject Azeri rule
    • After Azerbaijan’s troops were pushed out of the region following a war in the 1990s, these ethnic Armenians have been in administrative control of Nagorno-Karabakh, with support from Armenia.
  • September 2020: Clashes broke out that rapidly escalated to become the deadliest since the 1990s. 
  • Failed attempts to resolve: In the past three decades, ceasefires brokered by Russia and the United States have failed to hold.
  • Azerbaijan’s Conditions for Peace: Azerbaijan wants Armenia to officially recognise Nagorno-Karabakh as part of Azerbaijan. This factor will eliminate the Armenian historical presence in the region, as Azerbaijan will impose racial and discriminatory policies against the indigenous Armenians of the region.
  • Latest developments: 
    • Armenia has been witnessing domestic unrest since April this year related to Pashniyan’s handling of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict
    • There have been plans to oust their government or at least increase street pressure to prevent the PM from providing further concessions to Azerbaijan and Turkey when it comes to the security and right of self-determination of Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh (called Artsakh) and the recognition of Armenian Genocide.
  • Criticism against Armenian PM:
    • In Armenia, Pashinyan’s handling of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict received criticism after he agreed to hand over Armenian control of several territories to Azerbaijan.
    • Pashinyan increased the salaries of the country’s security forces, in an attempt to win their loyalty
    • The ongoing protests in Armenia have been marked by police brutality and the detaining of protestors, activists as well as Parliament members. 
    • Pashinyan’s stance on Nagorno-Karabakh: There has been a clear shift in Pashinyan’s views on Nagorno-Karabakh post May 2018, when he was elected leader of Armenia. Much of Pashinyan’s rhetoric was aimed at winning nationalist support. 

Challenges of Nagorno-Karabakh conflict

  • In this disputed region, there are hundreds of civilian settlements, residents of which would be directly impacted and potentially displaced if any large-scale war were to break out between the two countries.
  • Any military escalation would draw regional powers like Turkey and Russia more deeply into the conflict.
  • The energy-rich Azerbaijan has built several gas and oil pipelines across the Caucasus (the region between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea) to Turkey and Europe. 
    • This includes the Baku-Tblisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline (with a capacity of transporting 1.2 billion barrels a day), the Western Route Export oil pipeline, the Trans-Anatolian gas pipeline and the South Caucasus gas pipeline
    • Some of these pipelines pass close to the conflict zone (within 16 km of the border) and in an open war between the two countries, the pipelines could be targeted, which would impact energy supplies.
  • For both nations, these would create immediate challenges and war would not be in the interest of both countries.

Implications 

  • The conflict exposed the weakness of NATO and the European Union to help its ally at the time of crisis. NATO was seen as a divided house, incapable of taking decisive action against the biggest threat to its allies.
  • The biggest loss of reputation is for Russia, which chose to play neutral selling arms to both the parties to the conflict, despite a military pact with Armenia and a base there but had insisted it would not get involved in the conflict with Azerbaijan unless Armenian territory itself came under threat.
  • China could emerge as one of the main beneficiaries of the ceasefire – gaining a new route for the BRI plus leverage over Iran during crucial negotiations. The corridor between Nakhchivan and Azerbaijan would offer Beijing a second route to Europe in the South Caucasus bypassing Iran.

Neighbours’s Stand

  • Turkey: Support to Azerbaijan
    • Supporting Azerbaijan’s claims is its ally Turkey, which is adding its own conditions to the proposal, one of which includes pushing Yerevan to cease international lobbying for official recognition of the Armenian Genocide, an issue that has been a long-standing conflict between Yerevan and Ankara. 
    • Armenia has said approximately 1.5 million people were killed in 1915 during a genocide by the Ottoman Empire. 
    • While Turkey accepts that many Armenians living in the empire were killed by Ottoman forces during the First World War, it has consistently rejected the number of victims and has denied that the killings were systematic or constitute genocide.
  • Russia: Supporting Both
    • It sees the Caucasus and Central Asian region as its backyard. Russia enjoys good ties with both Azerbaijan and Armenia and supplies weapons to both. 
    • But Armenia is more dependent on Russia than the energy-rich, ambitious Azerbaijan. 
    • Russia also has a military base in Armenia. 
    • But Moscow, at least publicly, is trying to strike a balance between the two. 

India’ Response

  • No policy for South Caucasus: 
    • India does not have a publicly articulated policy for the South Caucasus, unlike “Neighbourhood First”, “Act East” or “ Central Asia Connect”. 
    • The region has remained on the periphery of its foreign policy radar. 
  • Asymmetry in relations: 
    • There is visible asymmetry in India’s relations with Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia. 
    • Armenia is the only country in the region with which it has a friendship and cooperation Treaty (signed in 1995), which, incidentally, would prohibit India from providing military or any other assistance to Azerbaijan in case Azerbaijan’s offensive in Nagorno-Karabakh spills over to the territory of Armenia. 
    • India has received three heads of states from Armenia, but none from Azerbaijan or Georgia
  • Adjusted Stances: 
    • India has adjusted its position on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict as the situation has evolved over the years. 
    • In the initial stages of the conflict in 1993, India had endorsed the concept of respect for territorial integrity. 
    • For quite some time now, India’s emphasis has been on a peaceful resolution of the conflict through diplomatic negotiations. 
  • Kashmir Angle: 
    • Armenia extends its unequivocal support to India on the Kashmir issue whereas Azerbaijan not only supports but also promotes Pakistan’s narrative on this issue.
    • India has every reason not to support Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity as Azerbaijan has shown scant regard for India’s territorial integrity violated by Pakistan in Jammu and Kashmir. 
  • Trade: 
    • Armenia: The levels of India’s trade or investment with Armenia are, however, very low.
    • Azerbaijan: ONGC/OVL have made relatively small investments in an oilfield project in Azerbaijan and GAIL is exploring the possibilities of cooperation in LNG. 
      • Azerbaijan falls on the International North South Transport Corridor route, connecting India with Russia through Central Asia; 
      • It can also connect India with Turkey and beyond through the Baku-Tbilisi-Kars passenger and freight rail link. 
  • Concerns for India:
    • It is difficult for India to publicly endorse Nagorno-Karabakh’s right for self-determination in view of the possible repercussions it can have repercussions for India. 
    • Adversaries may misuse it not only by making erroneous connections with Kashmir but also re-ignite secessionist movements in certain parts of India.
  • India’s Approach at Present: 
    • India has adopted a balanced and neutral stance and made a politically correct statement in which it has expressed its concern. 
    • India called for restraint and immediate cessation of hostilities and resolution of the conflict peacefully through diplomatic negotiations. 
    • India has also expressed its support for the OSCE Minsk Group’s continued efforts towards peaceful resolution, implying that India is not in favour of involvement of any other entity, including Turkey.

Way Ahead

  • Mediation with the aim of creating negotiations in good faith is a vital need. 
  • Confidence-building measures between Azerbaijan, the Republic of Artsakh and Armenia are needed. 

Source: IE

 

Other News of the Day

In Context New Development Bank announced to set up its regional office in GIFT City (Gujarat), India. New Development Bank About: It is a multilateral development bank operated by the BRICS states (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa). HQ: Shanghai, China Establishment:  Agreed by BRICS leaders at the 5th BRICS summit held in Durban,...
Read More

In News A National workshop on Sowa-Rigpa for the Sowa-Rigpa practitioners of North Eastern States is held in Gangtok, Sikkim. The National Institute of Sowa-Rigpa under the Ministry of Ayush in collaboration with the Namgyal Institute of Tibetology (NIT) is conducting this workshop. The Ministry of Ayush intends to set up a 30-bedded Sowa Rigpa...
Read More

In News  Recently ,The Army Training Command signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with Gandhinagar-based Rashtriya Raksha University (RRU) to develop a ‘Wargame Research and Development Centre’(WARDEC) in New Delhi.  About Project WARDEC It will be a first-of-its-kind simulation-based training centre in India that will use artificial intelligence (AI) to design virtual reality wargames. It...
Read More

In News  Recently ,the Government  reconstituted the Central Advisory Board on Archaeology(CABA) over seven years since its last meeting. About CABA It is meant to strengthen contacts between the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) and those in the field of archaeological research . The ASI re-constituted the board with the Culture Minister as the chairperson...
Read More

In News Recently, the centre said that India has reported highest FDI inflow worth $83 billion in 2021-2022. About the recent trend in FDI  In the Financial Year 2021-22 it touched a highest ever figure of $83.57 billion. FDI increased by around 22% post-Covid from 2020 to 2022 at $171.84 billion, in comparison to the...
Read More

In News Recently, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said that two bridges are built by China in the Pangong area which have been under the illegal occupation of China since the 1960s. About  The bridge being referred to is a second structure that China is building, right next to the bridge it constructed earlier...
Read More

In News The U.S President is set to launch IPEF to boost its economic presence in the Indo-Pacific region during the upcoming QUAD summit. What is IPEF? It is an economic framework for enhancing US involvement in Asia. It is to counter the influence of China in the region and fill the vacuum created by...
Read More

In News Scientists recently scanned a rock structure that is located 3,000 kilometres beneath Hawaii and is known to slow earthquake waves. Researchers used earthquake or seismic waves to peer into the earth’s interior.  The findings of the study are published in “Nature Communications.” More findings: The rock structure is what is called an ‘ultra-low...
Read More

In News  Recently ,the Department of Biotechnology (DBT) issued guidelines easing norms for research into Genetically Modified (GM) crops and circumventing challenges of using foreign genes to change crops profile. Major Highlights  The ‘Guidelines for Safety Assessment of Genome Edited Plants, 2022’ exempt researchers who use gene-editing technology to modify the genome of the plant...
Read More