In News
- Recently, the Supreme Court dismissed a writ petition challenging provisions of the Special Marriage Act (SMA).
About the petition
- The petition challenged the Constitutional validity of certain provisions of the SMA under which couples seek refuge for inter-faith and inter-caste marriages.
- The writ petition has called these provisions violative of the right to privacy guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution as they require couples to give a notice of 30 days before the date of marriage inviting objections from the public.
- The petition claims that the provisions contravene
- Article 14 on prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste and sex as well as,
- Article 15 on right to equality as these requirements are absent in personal laws.
Formalizing marriage in India
More about the Special Marriage Act, 1954
|
More about the procedure of SMA & the controversial provisions:
- Notice of 30 days:
- The SMA requires couples getting married under it to give a notice to the Marriage Officer 30 days before the date of marriage.
- Such a notice is then entered into the Marriage Notice Book maintained by the Marriage Officer, which can be inspected by “any person desirous of inspecting the same”.
- Displaying the notice & objections:
- These notices have to be also affixed at a “conspicuous place” in the office of the Marriage Officer so that anyone can raise an objection to the marriage.
- The process for making an objection such as:
- If either party has a living spouse, is incapable of giving consent due to “unsoundness of mind” or
- Is suffering from mental disorder resulting in the person being unfit for marriage or procreation.
- Inquiry procedure:
- The act also specifies the inquiry procedure to be followed after an objection has been submitted.
Issues & criticisms
- Making personal information public:
- The provisions, by throwing the personal information of the individuals open to public scrutiny, seriously damage one’s right to have control over her or his personal information and its accessibility.
- By making the personal details of the couple accessible to everyone, the very right of the couple to be the decision makers of their marriage is being hampered by the state.
- Misuse by anti-social elements:
- These public notices have been used by anti-social elements to harass couples getting married.
Similar controversial provisions in states
|
Source: TH
Next article
Zombie Ice