Syllabus: GS2/Effects of Policies on India’s Interest; GS3/Agriculture
Context
- In recent years, the relevance of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) has been questioned due to institutional paralysis, stalled negotiations, and rising protectionism.
About the World Trade Organisation (WTO)
- It is the only global international organisation dealing with the rules of trade between nations.
- Its main function is to ensure that trade flows as smoothly, predictably, and freely as possible.
Formation of WTO
- Predecessor: The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) was established by a multilateral treaty of 23 countries in 1947 after World War II.
- GATT was designed to provide an international forum that encouraged free trade between member states by regulating and reducing tariffs on traded goods and by providing a common mechanism for resolving trade disputes.
- The Marrakesh Agreement: The establishment of the WTO was agreed upon during the Uruguay Round of GATT negotiations, which took place from 1986 to 1994.
- It was signed by 123 nations on April 15, 1994, marking the culmination of the Uruguay Round and the official establishment of the WTO.
- It expanded upon the scope of the GATT to include new areas such as services, intellectual property, dispute resolution, and trade policy review mechanisms.
- The WTO officially commenced operations on January 1, 1995, in accordance with the 1994 Marrakesh Agreement, replacing the GATT.
Organisational Structure of WTO
- Ministerial Conference: The WTO’s apex decision-making body is the Ministerial Conference, which usually takes place every two years.
- General Council: It is just below the Ministerial Conference that meets several times a year at the WTO’s headquarters in Geneva.
- It meets as the Trade Policy Review Body and the Dispute Settlement Body.
- Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Council: It is for the Goods, Services, and Intellectual Property, and it reports to the General Council.
Dispute Settlement Mechanism of WTO: – The WTO has a Dispute Settlement Mechanism to resolve trade disputes between its member countries, and has one of the most active international dispute settlement mechanisms in the world. 1. Since 1995, over 350 rulings have been issued. – Appellate Body (Dispute Settlement System of WTO): These play a crucial role in resolving trade disputes among WTO members. 1. The Appellate Body was established in 1995 under Article 17 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes. |
Challenges Facing the WTO
- Dispute Settlement Crisis: The Appellate Body, WTO’s apex dispute resolution forum, has been non-functional since 2019 due to the U.S. blocking judge appointments.
- Countries now resort to bilateral retaliation and unilateral trade measures, weakening the WTO’s enforcement mechanisms.
- Rise of Protectionism: The U.S.–China trade war, export restrictions, and sanctions reflect growing disregard for WTO norms.
- Many nations violate Most Favoured Nation (MFN) principles, fragmenting the global trade order.
- Stalled Negotiations: The Doha Development Agenda (2001) aimed to address developing nations’ concerns but has stalled for over two decades.
- No meaningful consensus has been reached on agricultural subsidies, fisheries policies, or digital trade regulations.
- Failure to Address Emerging Trade Domains: WTO lacks binding rules on e-commerce, digital taxation, and climate-related trade policies.
- Countries increasingly form regional trade agreements, bypassing WTO frameworks.
- Marginalization of Developing Nations: Developing countries argue that their interests are sidelined in WTO negotiations.
- Special and Differential Treatment (S&DT) provisions are under threat, limiting their ability to protect domestic industries.
India’s Position on WTO Reforms
- Support for Multilateralism: India advocates for a rules-based global trading system but opposes premature liberalization that could harm domestic industries.
- Concerns Over Digital Trade Regulations: India has taken a cautious stance on data localization and e-commerce rules, fearing dominance by tech giants.
- Push for Agricultural Reforms: India demands fair agricultural trade policies, including public stockholding for food security.
Way Forward: Reform or Replacement?
- Reviving the Dispute Settlement Mechanism: Reforms are needed to restore the Appellate Body, ensuring fair resolution of trade disputes.
- Addressing Digital and Climate Trade Issues: WTO must establish binding rules on e-commerce, carbon border taxes, and green subsidies.
- Ensuring Fair Representation: Developing nations must have greater influence in trade negotiations, ensuring equitable policies.
- Special and Differential Treatment (SDT): Revisiting criteria that allow self-declared ‘developing’ countries like China to claim benefits.
Conclusion
- While the WTO faces institutional challenges, it remains a crucial pillar of global trade governance.
- Reforming its dispute resolution system, negotiating framework, and trade policies is essential to restore its relevance in the modern economic landscape.
Daily Mains Practice Question [Q] How can the World Trade Organization (WTO) adapt to address modern global challenges such as digital trade, rising protectionism, and equitable representation of developing nations to remain relevant in today’s economic landscape? |
Previous article
Pahalgam Terror Attack: Challenges and the Road Ahead